Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Burruchaga analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 2 - 1 Burruchaga
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.49% of points on their second serve, while Burruchaga has won 48.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Burruchaga has won 52.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 37.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burruchaga has saved 59.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 66.22% of matches played (W/L 49/ 25), with Burruchaga winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Burruchaga has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 32/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 127/ 92).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.88% of matches (W/L 43/ 16), where as Burruchaga has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.32% of matches (W/L 35/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Carabelli winning 2 times and Burruchaga being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 5 and Burruchaga winning 2. The last match between Carabelli and Burruchaga was at the Guayaquil Challenger, 03-11-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Roman Andres Burruchaga getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Burruchaga have played a deciding set 1 times, with Carabelli winning 0 times and Burruchaga 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 1, and Burruchaga 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.66 while Burruchaga has played against players with an average rank of 240.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burruchaga has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burruchaga has converted 46.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
114
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
143
Rank
143
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
63% (316-185)
Career Total W/L
58% (159-114)
64% (27-15)
YTD W/L
64% (23-13)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$93,615
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Roman Andres Burruchaga For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Carabelli VS Burruchaga
Sportsbook
Offer
Carabelli VS Burruchaga H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Roman Andres Burruchaga |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 37 | 35 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:24 | 2:0:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (129/213) | 65% (142/218) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (87/129) | 61% (87/142) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (36/84) | 47% (36/76) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (12/23) | 63% (12/19) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (95/218) | 42% (90/213) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Carabelli VS Burruchaga H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 6-1 |
Stats 
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Roman Andres Burruchaga |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (27/15) | 64% (23/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (56/39) | 59% (52/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (499/437) | 52% (434/398) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (25/14) | 67% (22/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 50 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 145 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.4 | 225.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1900/3024) | 62% (1714/2785) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1278/1900) | 64% (1103/1714) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (545/1124) | 49% (520/1071) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (151/324) | 47% (140/298) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1282/3050) | 43% (1164/2689) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 55% (6/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (21/7) | 70% (14/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (25/40) | 66% (23/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 67% (8/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 60% (9/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 90% (20/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 10% (20/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (19/4) | 31% (16/5) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Roman Andres Burruchaga Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Jozef Kovalik
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Juncheng Shang
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
50%
(
51 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Joris De Loore
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
83%
(
52 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Adrian Andreev
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Elias Ymer
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Burruchaga Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carabelli are available here and Burruchaga photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Roman Andres Burruchaga
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
